[ Subcontractor Scorecards ]
Deciding whether to re-engage a subcontractor usually comes down to memory -- was their paperwork ever a problem, were they involved in anything serious -- because that history is scattered across old projects and old conversations. Novato builds a scorecard from what's actually on record: every document and licence across every project, and every incident they've been linked to.

From the Tradies list, for anyone you've worked with.
Every requirement, across every project, with its status -- compliant, non-compliant, or timeline risk -- not just the current one.
Every incident they've been linked to since tracking began -- an empty list means genuinely none recorded, not just none this project.
Re-engage, follow up, or flag a concern based on what actually happened, not what you remember.
A scorecard is built entirely from records Novato already holds -- documents, verification outcomes, and incidents -- never a subjective rating typed in by a GC. Incident tracking is explicitly dated from when it began, so an empty incident list reads honestly as "none recorded since tracking started," not a false guarantee about anything before that.
No -- there's no star rating or manual score. It's a factual history: their real document/licence status and incident record, across every project they've worked on with you.
No -- it shows their document and licence history across every project, so you can see whether an issue is a one-off or a pattern.
That no incident has been linked to this subcontractor since incident-to-subcontractor tracking began -- it's shown with that context directly on the page, not presented as a guarantee about anything before that date.
A scorecard is a GC-side view for decision-making, not something shared back to the subcontractor directly.
Armor -- see Pricing for the full comparison.
Free trial, no credit card required.